Ethics - Never settled.
Nature is a self regulating system. Everything in nature is thinning the heard so to speak. Everything on every level. In the body cancer is a separate group that can't be killed off by the body. 
We are all biased toward our own survival, meaning no one that is a supporter of any type of eugenics thinks they too should be killed off. (with the execption of suicide bombers who are a good example of apoptosis) 
Abortion is far more of a eugenics issue than people want to admit. 
When I was a middle schooler in sex ed the pro abortion people came in. Kids were trying to figure out the ethics of life ending. I raised my hand and said "so a good reason for abortion would be someone who has basically no chance of being a normal person, like if there is no father and the mother is institutionalized for mental illness and the state would have to take the baby right away to be passed around in the system." They agreed yes, that is exactly the type of scenario that would justify abortion. I ten smiled and said....you just aborted me. They didn't have too much to say about that. I still don't fall into any camps. 
Anti abortion is pro war and antigun is pro abortion. Which is exactly the negative I would construct if I was in power and was aware of if I were into eugenics. 

Others in history have clearly defaulted to genetics for eugenics. Understanding epi-genetics and genetic expression being determined by the environment makes that far less concrete. In the same way the white supremacists are having a hard time with genetic testing showing that they also are not "pure" as they would like to say.  Most of these ideas are cultural as opposed to genetic anyway. People are trying to hold onto their norm. 

I see a trend with super villains often being both intelligent and disconnected socially. The more intelligent the less the ethics are emotional and the more logically consistent they are.  Where people in society seem to be ok with death as long as it is part of the societal norm. 

The top people within the systems of our society make decisions about who lives and dies. The plus is that who dies is never them the downside is having to make the call. Everyone else that is subject to them has the plus of not having to decides but the negative is maybe being killed off. I can say as someone who doesn't have to decide it is easy to criticize everyone that does as evil. 

Some default to God so anything that happens is gods will and hes perfect so now all kinds of really stupid things can be assumed as perfect. This a convenient ethic I was raised with. It says in the bible submit to all governments because god put them there. Of coarse this makes any revolt against Britain or war against the nazi's going against gods will. Interesting. 

I have never met a blood relative. I have no linage and have no ideas about legacy. I am learning a massive amount of information and becoming increasingly isolated so I think about society as an observer not as a participant. I see how silly so many of the social/emotional ethics are. 

Like veganism saying things with eyes are conscious and things that don't have eyes are not. Many vegans connect with animals and then become very violent toward humans. Killing a killer is an often touched on theme as you become the thing you are opposed to. 
I am starting to identify with nature and it is a shape shifter. It is life itself and it never dies it just changes, it is light itself. 

I don't have any opinions about this I know that I want to live but with things like 5G being so known to me and so unknown to others my ethics are met simply by telling people in my health blog. I do need certain things from people and that helps. Very few inquire and no one wants to pay me to find out how to stay alive. Everyone shows their priorities with their actions. 

I do know that nature does not care about humans any more than it cares about anything else. Not at all. 

I will say that blue light and wifi cause neurological regression making people opporate from the limbic system and not the the prefrontal cortex. This essentially makes people less human and more animalistic. 
Most do not have the ability to think critically. I am also aware that the percentage of the population that is not consuming drugs or intoxicants on a daily basis is very small. Add in thye neuro effects of tech and you have a very low functioning society. It will colapse soon. As the parents currently paying for their kids to play will die off and the kids will have3 no ability to provide for themselves. many will die in the basements of their homes surrounded by video games and monster drinks. So I feel very much like the sober guy at the bar. The infra structure can not support techy. Econ is something most know nothing about. Ask what is money most have no clue. 

I do not know what to make of the ethics of life, I don't have to. I do know in what ways the population will kill itself off.  

Best quote from the watchmen 
"Without condoning or condemning, I understand"

What do these guys all have in common? From the outside maybe not much. maybe a lot of conflicting ideas. I was recently introduced to Alan Moore (on youtube) and have had lots of fun listening to his ideas on things. At this point I'm far more set to ask which language a person is using than to say how different it is. I find most conflicting ideas are just a refusal to break down the words to see the meaning. Most arguments are arguments of semantics. I here about the subatomic quantum realm and it is just another way of saying what Alan Moore would call idea space. Science and spirituality are now synonymous for me. I have spent a lot of time with these four guys I have never met and I have hung out with them in idea space. Alan Watts is dead but he is the one I have spent the most imaginary time with. I say imaginary because I've never met him in "real' life. One of the best/worst realizations I've ever had is that everyone I've ever known and everyone that has known me didn't know the same me that I know. We are all ideas. Faces on ideas that may have some truth to them. I was married for ten years and had a dream about my ex wife last night who I haven't seen or spoken to in years and when I woke up I realized that (I had seen her in idea space and that it wasn't her at all and that I don't know her now and then it follows that I didn't know her then and she didn't know me any more than I know Alan Watts. Ideas are all we are and I grieve tangibility and at the same time then find so much freedom in creating an idea of myself and others on my own instead of allowing society or others to create an idea of me.  
Jack Kruse is a Neuro surgeon who has probably impacted my life more than any other person on the planet. He is able to explain deep science. Yesterday I posted a Fb question in a group about over rated health topics and right away Dr. Kruse responded. I got (as I just typed those words I got a notification from Jack Kruse on FB which is both creepy and fits with Alan Moore's ideas serendipity ideas) Anyway, I posted and Kruse himself responded. I was a bit star struck and at the same time realized here we are bot on FB on a Saturday morning thinking about how bad tech is and I couldn't help but see the joke in it. Everything has pluses and minuses. 
I also bought a concert ticket to see Conor Oberest yesterday who is coming into town. I got excited and afraid. You see there have been times when I have seen favorite bands and had an idea of the lead singer having this connection with me because I identified with certain songs which is why I love shows so much even thought they are high stimulation atmospheres that I normally would avoid. Once I saw a favorite band and the lead singer came across like a real ass hole and it kind of ruined the music a bit. Why I never met the singer either when I was listening to the music or listening to him say ass hole things. these are all ideas. I often think I wish I wasn't alone right now but them when I am around other people I think I wish I wasn't alone and obviously being perceived in a way that I don't feel represents me properly.  
The Alan watts explanation of the universal observer and us being essentially the glasses with different prescriptions that sees things helps. 

We are all island both held together and separated by ocean. The lines of real and virtual are getting blurred with technology. I have one hand in the material l world and the other in the conceptual. 
I do see that in the past I wanted things so that others could see them. No one can see the things that are most important to me the ideas that have been mixed together from the 4 people above and so many more. those are for me alone. It is fun to try though which explains this post. 

​Also this....